Which FF derivative is recommended?

[Alexo]

I am trying to decide between Pale moon and Waterfox.

[cbaker_admin]

Personally, I have only used Pale Moon. I might give Waterfox a try someday just to see what does that other Fx clones don't.

[Alexo]

My understanding is that Waterfox will support both kinds of extensions.

[BackerUpper]

I'd suggest Pale Moon. Excellent support and information on its forum. You could also keep an eye on the development of , which will be 'closer' to Firefox than Pale Moon, if that's what you are looking for.

[Alexo]

I prefer a browser that will support both XUL and Webextensions.

[BackerUpper]

That's not a simple task to achieve... perhaps Basilisk will do that, it's not clear. And Waterfox, it's not really clear where it's going either.

[Sun42]

[gracious1]

[gracious1]

[illiadnot]

maybe I need glasses, but this seems to be the 'newest' Basilisk question... ??

for those newbies worried, Basilisk may look like 'Australis' ----- BUT it *will* take *.xpi installs!!

Note: the following is from 2015! when firefox still used XPI.. and pale moon can use them!
just try https://codefisher.org/toolbar_button/ for much more colorful icons! :D

I am a basilisk newbie myself, and I hear pale moon may soon get its 'features', but note its only a few hard working guys doing it.. so give them some patience!!! :D

https://www.basilisk-browser.org/